Showing posts with label racisme. Show all posts
Showing posts with label racisme. Show all posts

6 January 2011

Israël's "ziektekiemen"

Is Israël wel, zoals wordt beweerd, een "democratie", wanneer haar volksvertegenwoordigers dezelfde taal uitslaan in een proces waar wij over zeggen "dit nooit meer"? Wanneer een oppositie, mensen die ook democratie voor minderheden bepleiten, in het parlement "ziektekiemen" en "verraders die tegen elke prijs vervolgd moeten worden" worden genoemd? Waar hebben we dat soort taal eerder gehoord? Met zulke (PVV-)vrienden heeft Israël geen vijanden nodig. Het zal aan zichzelf ten onder gaan.

MK Ben-Ari: Eradicate treacherous leftists

After Knesset approves establishment of inquiry commission into funding of left-wing Israeli organizations, National Union MK tells Jerusalem conference they are 'enemies of Israel,' equates them to Hamas, Hezbollah

Ynet News | Roni Sofer, Yair Altman | 01.05.11


Just hours after the Knesset approved a motion calling for a parliamentary investigation into the activity of B'Tselem, Yesh Din, Breaking the Silence and other groups, National Union MK Michael Ben-Ari referred to members of the leftist organizations as "traitors who must be persecuted at any cost."

Speaking at an SOS Israel conference in Jerusalem Wednesday evening, Ben-Ari called the leftists "germs" and "enemies of Israel."

The rightist lawmaker went as far as equating the leftist organizations to Hamas and Hezbollah.

In an audio tape obtained by Ynet, Ben-Ari can be heard saying, "Elements that want to destroy the Jewish state are operating within the State of Israel. They are nothing short of traitors. They are persecuting IDF soldiers and want to castrate our resilience."

"I see the people from Peace Now; they each have a private car. Every clerk has the finest equipment. Who funds all of this? The greatest Israel haters are funding this. If we'll have to enact a law in the Knesset to eradicate this dangerous enemy, that is what we'll do. Such a germ can destroy Israeli society. This enemy threatens the state's existence," he added.

Extreme rightist Itamar Ben-Gvir, who also attended the conference, called on activists to protest outside the homes of the leaders of the leftist groups "and explain to their neighbors that these are people who harm IDF soldiers and cause Israel damage.

"We must also face them on the legal front – file lawsuits and show them we are not suckers. Those who harm the State of Israel and its soldiers will be punished," he said.

In addition to the mass support from right-wing factions, the proposal to set up an inquiry commission into the activity of leftist groups was also backed by three members of Kadima, which heads the opposition. "We must erect a democratic and Zionist barrier against the use of human rights claims at the expense of Israeli patriotism," MK Otniel Schneller said.

"These organizations apparently have a good reason for concealing their funding sources," he said.

Kadima MK Yulia Shamalov Berkovich said, "When I see Israeli organizations that harm the only consensus in Israel – the soldiers – I want to know how this happens."

MK Robert Tiviaev, who also voted in favor of an investigation, said "groups such as Adalah cannot be allowed to operate against the IDF."


Arieh Eldad, partijgenoot van Ben-Ari, organiseerde in 2008 de conferentie 'Facing Jihad' met Geert Wilders. Rechts van Wilders een andere extremist, Daniel Pipes, die o.a. van mening is dat alle Amerikaanse moslims geïnterneerd moeten worden in speciale kampen.

31 December 2010

"The Darkness to Expel!"

It is easy to despair before the filthy wave of racism that is engulfing us

Gush Shalom | By Uri Avnery | 25/12/10


The remedy for this despair: the growing number of young people, sons and daughters of the new Israeli generation, who are joining the fight against racism and occupation.

This week, several hundred of them gathered in a hall in Tel Aviv (belonging, ironically, to the Zionist Federation of America) to launch a book published by the group “Breaking the Silence”.

In the hall there were some veterans of the peace camp, but the great majority of those present were youngsters in their twenties, male and female, who have completed their military service.
“The Occupation of the Territories” is a book of 344 pages, consisting of almost 200 testimonies by soldiers about the daily and nightly life of the occupation. The soldiers supplied the eyewitness accounts, and the organization, which is composed of ex-soldiers, verified, compared and sifted them. In the end, 183 of some 700 testimonies were selected for publication.

Not even one of these testimonies was denied by the army spokesman, who generally hastens to contradict honest accounts of what is happening in the occupied territories. Since the editors of the book have themselves served as soldiers in these places, it was easy for them to distinguish between truth and falsehood.

Israeli right wing activists demonstrate in Bat Yam near Tel Aviv, Israel, Monday, Dec. 20, 2010. Scores of local Bat Yam residents and right wing activists demonstrated Monday against selling or renting property to non-Jews, following a recent a religious ruling by several dozen of Israel's top rabbis barring Jews from selling or renting homes to non-Jews - testifying to a growing radicalism within the rabbinical community at a time when frictions between Israeli Arabs and Jews are mounting. Hebrew on signs reads: "Jewish girls belong to the Jewish People", on T-shirts: " Jews, lets win".

The book makes very depressing reading, and not because it details gruesome atrocities. On the contrary, the editors made it a point not to include incidents of exceptional brutality committed by sadists, which can be found in every army unit in Israel and throughout the world. Rather, they wanted to throw light on the grey routine of the occupation.

There are accounts of nocturnal incursions into quiet Palestinian villages as exercises – breaking into random houses where there were no “suspects”, terrorizing children, women and men, creating mayhem in the village – all this to “train” the soldiers. There are stories about the humiliation of passers-by at the checkpoints (“Clean up the checkpoint and you will get your keys back!”), casual harassment (“He started to complain, so I hit him in the face with the butt of my weapon!”). Every testimony is meticulously documented: time, place, unit.

At the launch of the book, some of the testimonies were shown on film, with the witnesses daring to show their faces and identify themselves by their full name. These were no exceptional people, no fanatics or bleeding hearts. No weepers of the “we shoot and we weep” school. Just ordinary young people, who had time to come to grips with their personal experiences.

There are even occasional flashes of humor. Like the tale of the soldier who had for a long time been manning a roadblock between two Palestinian villages, without understanding its purpose or its security value. One day, a bulldozer suddenly appeared from nowhere, uprooted the concrete blocks and drove off with them, again without any explanation. “They have stolen my roadblock!” the soldier complains, having got used to the place.

The titles of the testimonies speak for themselves: “To produce sleeplessness in the village”, “We used to send neighbors to disarm explosive charges”, “The battalion commander ordered us to shoot anyone trying to remove the bodies”, “The commander of the navy commandos put the muzzle of the rifle into the man’s mouth”, “They told us to shoot at anybody moving in the street”, “You can do whatever you feel like, nobody is going to question it”, “You shoot at the TV set for fun”, “I did not know that there were roads for Jews only”, “A kind of total arbitrariness”, “The [Hebron settler] boys beat up the old woman”, “Arrest the settlers? The army cannot do that”. And so on. Just routine.

The intention of the book is not to uncover atrocities and show the soldiers as monsters. It aims to present a situation: the ruling over another people, with all the high-handed arbitrariness that this necessarily entails, humiliation of the occupied, corruption of the occupier. According to the editors, it is quite impossible for the individual soldier to make a difference. He is just a cog in a machine that is inhuman by its very nature.

GROUPS OF young people who are simply fed up are springing to life in the country. They are signs of an awakening that finds its expression in the daily fight of hundreds of groups devoted to different causes. Only seemingly different – because these causes are essentially bound up with each other. The fight against the occupation, for the refugees who seek shelter in this country, against the demolition of the houses of the Bedouin in the Negev, against the invasion of Arab neighborhoods in East Jerusalem by settlers, for equal rights for the Arab citizens in Israel, against social injustices, for the preservation of the environment, against government corruption, against religious coercion, etc etc. They have a common denominator: the fight for a different Israel.

Young volunteers for each of these fights - and for all of them together - are needed today more than ever, in face of the racism that is raising its ugly head all over Israel – an open racism, shameless and indeed proud of itself.
The phenomenon by itself is not new. What is new is the loss of any vestige of shame. The racists shout their message on every street corner and earn applause from politicians and rabbis.

It started with the flood of racist bills designed to delegitimize the Arab citizens. “Admission committees”, “loyalty oaths”, and much more. Then came the religious edict of the chief rabbi of Safed, forbidding Jews to let apartments to Arabs. This still caused shock and embarrassment. Since then, however, all the dams have broken. A gang of 14-year old boys ambushed Arabs in the center of Jerusalem, using a 14- year old girl as bait, and beat them unconscious. Hundreds of rabbis all over the country signed a manifesto forbidding the letting of apartments to “foreigners” (meaning Arabs who have lived in the country for centuries). In Bat Yam, a city bordering Tel Aviv, a stormy demonstration called for the expulsion of all Arabs from the town. Next day, a demonstration in Tel Aviv’s squalid Hatikva quarter demanded the expulsion of refugees and foreign workers from the neighborhood.

Ostensibly, the demonstrations in Bat Yam and Hatikva were aimed at different targets: the first against Arabs, the second against foreign workers. But the same well-known fascist activists appeared and spoke at both, carrying the same placards and shouting the same slogans. The most conspicuous of these was the assertion that the Arabs and the foreigners are endangering Jewish women – the Arabs marry them and take them to their villages, the foreign workers flirt with them. “Jewish Women for the Jewish People!” cried the posters – as if women were property.

The connection between racism and sex has always intrigued researchers. White racists in the US spread the rumor that “niggers” have bigger penises. Among German Nazi newspapers, the most sensationalist was Der Stürmer, a pornographic sheet filled with stories about innocent blond girls seduced by the money of crooked-nosed ugly Jews. Its editor, Julius Streicher, was condemned and hanged in Nuremberg.

Some believe that one of the roots of racism is a feeling of sexual inadequacy, the lack of self-confidence of men afraid of sexual impotence and/or competition – the very opposite of the picture of the macho racist he-man. It is enough to look at the racist protesters to draw conclusions.

JEAN-PAUL SARTRE famously said that every person is a racist – the difference being between those who admit it to themselves and try to combat it and those who do not.

That is undoubtedly true. I have a simple test for the power of racism: you are driving and somebody cuts your path. If it is a black driver, you say: “Damn nigger!” If it is a woman, you shout: “Go home to your kitchen!” If he wears a kippah, you cry: “Bloody Dos!” (“Dos” is a derogatory Hebrew term for a religious Jew.) If it is a driver without special features, you just shout: “Idiot! Who gave you a driving license?”

The hatred of strangers, the aversion to everyone who is unlike you, are – so it seems – biological traits, remnants from the time of ancient man, when every stranger was a threat to the limited resources the tribe had to depend on. It exists in many other animal species, too. Nothing to be proud of.

The civilized human being, and even more so the civilized human society, has a duty to fight these traits - not only because they are ugly in themselves, but also because they hinder the modernization of the globalized world, In which cooperation between peoples and between people is imperative. It takes us back to the stone age.

The situation here is now moving in the opposite direction: the country is embracing the racist demon. After millennia as the victims of racism, it seems as if Jews here are happy to be able to do unto others what has been done to them.

IT IS impossible to ignore the central role played by rabbis in this filthy mess. They ride the wave and assert that this is the spirit of Judaism. They quote the holy texts at length.

The truth is that Judaism, like almost every religion, includes racist and anti-racist, humanist and barbarian elements. The Crusaders, who massacred the Jews on their way to the Holy Land and who slaughtered the inhabitants of Jerusalem – Muslims and Jews alike – when they conquered the city, shouted: “God Wills It!” One can find in the New Testament magnificent passages preaching love, side by side with quite different sections. So, too, in the Koran there are Surahs full of love for humankind and calls for justice and equality, as well as others full of intolerance and hatred.

So, too, the Hebrew Bible. The racists quote Rabbi Maimonides, who interpreted two biblical words as a commandment not to let non-Jews reside in the country. The whole Book of Joshua is a call to genocide. The Bible commands the Israelites to murder the entire tribe of Amalek (“both man and woman, infant and suckling”) and the Prophet Samuel dethroned King Saul because he spared the lives of Amalekite prisoners (1 Samuel 15).

But the Hebrew Bible is also a book of unequalled humanity. It starts with the description of the creation of man and woman, stressing that all human beings are created in the image of God - and therefore equal. “So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him, male and female created he him.” The Bible repeatedly demands the treatment of “Gerim” (foreigners living among the Israelites) as Israelites, “because you were foreigners in the land of Egypt”.

As Gershom Schocken, the owner and long-time editor in chief of Haaretz, pointed out in an article republished this week on the 20th anniversary of his death: Ezra did indeed expel the non-Jewish wives from the community, but before that, foreign women played a central role in the Biblical story. Bathsheba was the wife of a Hittite, before she married King David and became the mother of the house from which the Messiah will come in due course (or from which, as Christians believe, Jesus – who was born 2010 years ago today – already came.) David himself was the descendant of Ruth, a Moabite woman. King Ahab, the greatest of Israelite kings, married a Phoenician woman.

When our racists present the ugliest face of Judaism, ignoring its universalist message, they do great damage to the religion of millions of Jews around the world. The most important Jewish rabbis were silent this week in face of the racist fire that was ignited by rabbis, or murmured something about “ways of peace” – referring to the rule forbidding the provocation of Goyim, because they might treat the Jews in their countries as the Jews treat the minorities in their own state. Up to now, no Christian priest has yet called upon his flock not to let apartments to Jews – but it could happen.

The silence of the “Torah sages” is thunderous. Even more so the silence of the country’s political leaders: Nobel Peace Prize laureate Shimon Peres did not roar his outrage, and Binyamin Netanyahu has contented himself with calling upon the racists “not to take the law into their own hands”. Not a single word against racism, not a single word about morality and justice.

When I listened to the ex-soldiers at the “Breaking the Silence” meeting, I was filled with hope. This generation understands its duty to heal the state in which they will spend their lives.

In the words of the Hanukkah song, which is rapidly becoming the anthem of the anti-racist demonstrations: “We come the darkness to expel!”


Ethiopian Jews protesting Israeli racist policies.

30 December 2010

Is an Israeli Jewish sense of victimization perpetuating the conflict with Palestinians?

Haaretz | By Akiva Eldar | 30-01-09


A new study of Jewish Israelis shows that most accept the 'official version' of the history of the conflict with the Palestinians. Is it any wonder, then, that the same public also buys the establishment explanation of the operation in Gaza?

A pioneering research study dealing with Israeli Jews' memory of the conflict with the Arabs, from its inception to the present, came into the world together with the war in Gaza. The sweeping support for Operation Cast Lead confirmed the main diagnosis that arises from the study, conducted by Daniel Bar-Tal, one of the world's leading political psychologists, and Rafi Nets-Zehngut, a doctoral student: Israeli Jews' consciousness is characterized by a sense of victimization, a siege mentality, blind patriotism, belligerence, self-righteousness, dehumanization of the Palestinians and insensitivity to their suffering. The fighting in Gaza dashed the little hope Bar-Tal had left – that this public would exchange the drums of war for the cooing of doves.

"Most of the nation retains a simplistic collective memory of the conflict, a black-and-white memory that portrays us in a very positive light and the Arabs in a very negative one," says the professor from Tel Aviv University. This memory, along with the ethos of the conflict and collective emotions such as fear, hatred and anger, turns into a psycho-social infrastructure of the kind experienced by nations that have been involved in a long-term violent conflict. This infrastructure gives rise to the culture of conflict in which we and the Palestinians are deeply immersed, fanning the flames and preventing progress toward peace. Bar-Tal claims that in such a situation, it is hard even to imagine a possibility that the two nations will be capable of overcoming the psychological obstacles without outside help.

Scholars the world over distinguish between two types of collective memory: popular collective memory – that is, representations of the past that have been adopted by the general public; and official collective memory, or representations of the past that have been adopted by the country's official institutions in the form of publications, books or textbooks.

The idea for researching the popular collective memory of Israeli Jews was raised by Nets-Zehngut, a Tel Aviv lawyer who decided to return to the academic world. At present he is completing his doctoral thesis in the International Center for Cooperation and Conflict Resolution at Columbia University's Teachers College. The study, by him and Bar-Tal, entitled "The Israeli-Jewish Collective Memory of the Israeli-Arab/Palestinian Conflict," examines how official collective memory in the State of Israel regarding the creation of the 1948 refugee problem has changed over time.

Bar-Tal became enthusiastic about the idea and, with funding from the International Peace Research Association Foundation, he conducted a survey in the summer of 2008 among a representative sample of 500 Jewish Israeli adults. The study demonstrated that widespread support for the official memory testifies to a lower level of critical thinking, as well as belief in traditional values, high identification with Jewish identity, a tendency to delegitimize the Arabs, and support for taking aggressive steps against the Palestinians.

In a telephone interview from New York, Nets-Zehngut says it is very clear that those with a "Zionist memory" see Israel and the Jews as the victims in the conflict, and do not tend to support agreements or compromises with the enemy in order to achieve peace. This finding, he explains, demonstrates the importance of changing the collective memory of conflicts, making it less biased and more objective – on condition, of course, that there is a factual basis for such a change.

Bar-Tal, who has won international awards for his scientific work, immigrated to Israel from Poland as a child in the 1950s.

"I grew up in a society that for the most part did not accept the reality that the authorities tried to portray, and fought for a different future," he says. "I have melancholy thoughts about nations where there is an almost total identity between the agents of a conflict, on the one hand, who nurture the siege mentality and the existential fear, and various parts of society, on the other. Nations that respond so easily to battle cries and hesitate to enlist in favor of peace do not leave room for building a better future."

Bar-Tal emphasizes that the Israeli awareness of reality was also forged in the context of Palestinian violence against Israeli citizens, but relies primarily on prolonged indoctrination that is based on ignorance and even nurtures it. In his opinion, an analysis of the present situation indicates that with the exception of a small minority, which is capable of looking at the past with an open mind, the general public is not interested in knowing what Israel did in Gaza for many years; how the disengagement was carried out and why, or what its outcome was for the Palestinians; why Hamas came to power in democratic elections; how many people were killed in Gaza from the disengagement until the start of the recent war; and whether it was possible to extend the recent cease-fire or even who violated it first.

"Although there are accessible sources, where it is possible to find the answers to those questions, the public practices self-censorship and accepts the establishment version, out of an unwillingness to open up to alternative information – they don't want to be confused with the facts. We are a nation that lives in the past, suffused with anxiety and suffering from chronic closed-mindedness," charges Bar-Tal.

That describes the state of mind in 2000, when most of the pubic accepted the simplistic version of then-prime minister Ehud Barak regarding the failure of the Camp David summit and the outbreak of the second intifada, and reached what seemed like the obvious conclusion that "there is no partner" with whom to negotiate.

Bar-Tal: "After the bitter experience of the Second Lebanon War, during which the memory of the war was taken out of their hands and allowed to be formed freely, the country's leaders learned their lesson, and decided that they wouldn't let that happen again. They were not satisfied with attempts to inculcate Palestinian awareness and tried to influence Jewish awareness in Israel as well. For that purpose, heavy censorship and monitoring of information were imposed" during the Gaza campaign.

The professor believes that politicians would not have been successful in formulating the collective memory of such a large public without the willing enlistment of the media. Almost all the media focused only on the sense of victimization of the residents of the so-called "Gaza envelope" and the south. They did not provide the broader context of the military operation and almost completely ignored – before and during the fighting – the situation of the residents of besieged Gaza. The human stories from Sderot and the dehumanization of Hamas and the Palestinians provided the motivation for striking at Gaza with full force.

Nets-Zehngut and Bar-Tal find a close connection between the collective memory and the memory of "past persecutions of Jews" ("the whole world is against us," and the Holocaust). The more significant the memory of persecution, the stronger the tendency to adopt Zionist narratives. From this we can understand the finding that adults, the religious public and those with more right-wing political views tend to adopt the Zionist version of the conflict, while young people, the secular public and those with left-wing views tend more to adopt critical narratives.

The atmosphere in the street and in the media during the weeks of the Gaza war seems to have confirmed the central finding of the study: "The ethos of the conflict is deeply implanted in Jewish society in Israel. It is a strongly rooted ideology that justifies the goals of the Jews, adopts their version, presents them in a very positive light and rejects the legitimacy of the Arabs, and primarily of the Palestinians," notes Bar-Tal.

For example, when asked the question, "What were the reasons for the failure of the negotiations between [Ehud] Barak and [Yasser] Arafat in summer 2000?" 55.6 percent of the respondents selected the following answer: "Barak offered Arafat a very generous peace agreement, but Arafat declined mainly because he did not want peace." Another 25.4 percent believed that both parties were responsible for the failure, and about 3 percent replied that Arafat did want peace, but Barak was not forthcoming enough in meeting the needs of the Palestinians. (Sixteen percent replied that they didn't know the answer.)

Over 45 percent of Israeli Jews have imprinted on their memories the version that the second intifada broke out only, or principally, because Arafat planned the conflict in advance. Only 15 percent of them believe the viewpoint presented by three heads of the Shin Bet security services: that the intifada was mainly the eruption of a popular protest. Over half those polled hold the Palestinians responsible for the failure of the Oslo process, 6 percent hold Israel responsible, and 28.4 percent said both sides were equally responsible.

Among the same Jewish public, 40 percent are unaware that at the end of the 19th century, the Arabs were an absolute majority among the inhabitants of the Land of Israel. Over half of respondents replied that in the United Nations partition plan, which was rejected by the Arabs, the Arabs received an equal or larger part of the territory of the Land of Israel, relative to their numbers; 26.6 percent did not know that the plan offered the 1.3 million Arabs a smaller part of the territory (44 percent) than was offered to 600,000 Jews (55 percent).

Bar-Tal claims that this distortion of memory is no coincidence. He says that the details of the plan do not appear in any textbook, and this is a deliberate omission. "Knowledge of how the land was divided could arouse questions regarding the reason why the Arabs rejected the plan and make it possible to question the simplistic version: We accepted the partition plan, they didn't."

However, his study shows that a larger percentage of the Jewish population in Israel believes that in 1948, the refugees were expelled (47.2 percent of respondents), than those who still retain the old Zionist version (40.8 percent), according to which the refugees left on their own initiative. On this point, not only do almost all the history books provide up-to-date information, but some local school textbooks do as well. Even on the television program "Tekuma" ("Rebirth," a 1998 documentary series about Israel's first 50 years), the expulsion of the Arabs was mentioned.

Nets-Zehngut also finds a degree of self-criticism in the answers relating to the question of overall responsibility for the conflict. Of those surveyed, 46 percent think that the responsibility is more or less evenly divided between Jews and Arabs, 4.3 percent think that the Jews are mainly to blame, and 43 percent think that the Arabs and the Palestinians are mainly to blame for the outbreak and continuation of the conflict. It turns out, therefore, that when the country's education system and media are willing to deal with distorted narratives, even a collective memory that has been etched into people's minds for years can be changed.

Bar-Tal says he takes no comfort in the knowledge that Palestinian collective memory suffers from similar ills, and that it is also in need of a profound change – a change that would help future generations on both sides to regard one another in a more balanced, and mainly a more humane manner. This process took many decades for the French and the Germans, and for the Protestants and the Catholics in Northern Ireland. When will it finally begin here, too?

(verwijderd) http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/objects/pages/PrintArticleEn.jhtml?itemNo=1060061

Never again? Elderly Palestinian women called “whores” on Yad Vashem tour, while racism explodes across Israel

Max Blumenthal | 12.30.10


This week, a group of elderly Palestinian women were escorted to the Yad Vashem Holocaust Martyrs' and Heroes' Remembrance musuem to learn about the Jewish genocide in Europe. At the entrance of the museum, they were surrounded by a group of Jewish Israeli youth who recognized them as Arabs. "Sharmouta!" the young Israelis shouted at them again and again, using the Arabic slang term for whores, or sluts.

The Palestinians had been invited to attend a tour arranged by the Israeli Bereaved Families Forum, an organization founded by an Israeli whose son was killed in combat by Palestinians. They were joined by a group of Jewish Israeli women who, like them, had lost family members to violence related to the conflict. Presumably, both parties went on the tour in good faith, hoping to gain insight into the suffering of women on the other side of the conflict.

Unfortunately, the Palestinian members (who unlike the Israelis live under occupation and almost certainly had to obtain special permits just to go to Yad Vashem) learned an unusual lesson of the Holocaust: A society that places the Holocaust at the center of its historical narrative — that stops traffic for two minutes each year on the national holiday known as Yom Ha'Shoah — could also raise up a generation of little fascists goose-stepping into the future full of irrational hatred.

"In Palestinian culture, older women are most honored and they could not believe their ears," said Sami Abu Awwad, a Palestinian coordinator of the tour. "We never talk like this to older women. The Palestinians, who were all grandmothers, were very shocked and offended."



The report on this outburst of Jewish Israeli racism comes from the Israeli news website Walla! For some reason, I could not find reporting on it anywhere in English.

Perhaps the story was lost in the flood of reports about the anti-Arab racism that poured through the streets of Israel this week. Besides the publication of a series of rabbinical letters forbidding renting to Arabs and condemning relationships between Jews and Arabs, a school principal in Jaffa prohibited Palestinian-Israeli students from speaking Arabic to one another. In Bat Yam, a mostly Russian suburb just south of Jaffa, Jewish residents demonstrated against the presence their Arab neighbors. "Any Jewish woman who goes with an Arab should be killed; any Jew who sells his home to an Arab should be killed," one protester reportedly shouted. And in Tel Aviv, locals rallied for the expulsion of foreign workers.

The Jerusalem Post reported:

On Saturday, three teenage girls born to African migrant parents were attacked and severely beaten by a mob of teenagers while walking to their homes in the Hatikva neighborhood.

That same night, someone tried to torch an apartment in Ashdod housing seven Sudanese citizens. The assailants set a blazing tire outside the front door of the apartment, and five of the seven residents were lightly hurt by smoke inhalation before they managed to break the burglar bars and flee through a window.

Meanwhile, in Jerusalem, a gang of Jewish youths was arrested after staging several random attacks on young Palestinian men with weapons including tear gas, which would be hard to acquire from anywhere except the army. Ynet reported:

The gang of teens was allegedly headed by a 14-year-old boy, and used a girl their age to seduce Arab youths.

The girl would then lead the young men to a meeting point in the city's Independence Park, where they were allegedly brutally attacked by the teens with stones, glass bottles and tear gas. Police suspect the girl took part in three of the assaults.

Daniel Bar-Tal, a renowned Israeli political psychologist who has conducted some of the most comprehensive surveys of Israeli attitudes since Operation Cast Lead, found that the racist, authoritarian trends that are increasingly pronounced in Israeli society are products of a "psycho-social infrastructure" dedicated to promoting "a sense of victimization, a siege mentality, blind patriotism, belligerence, self-righteousness, dehumanization of the Palestinians and insensitivity to their suffering."


The only image of a Palestinian inside Yad Vashem depicts the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem sig heiling Nazi troops

This infrastructure is comprised of institutions like the Zionist education system, the Israeli Defense Forces, and even Yad Vashem, which explicitly links the Palestinian national struggle to Nazism.

Indeed, the only image of a Palestinian in all of Yad Vashem (at least that I am aware of) is of the Grand Mufti Hajj Amin Al-Husseini, who was forced by the British to flee to Germany, where he became a (not very successful) Nazi collaborator. In recent years, the Mufti has become a key fixture of Israeli propaganda efforts against the Palestinians. As such, a photo is featured prominently on a wall in Yad Vashem depicting him sig heiling a group of Nazi troops. However, there is no mention anywhere in Yad Vashem of the 9000 Palestinian Arabs the British recruited to fight the Nazis, or of the 233,000 North African volunteers who fought and died while battling the Nazis in the French Liberation Army (and whose heroic efforts were dramatized in the excellent film, "Days of Glory").

According to Peter Novick, the author of "The Holocaust in American Life," though the Mufti played no significant part in the Holocaust, he plays a "starring role" in Yad Vashem's Encyclopedia of the Holocaust. "The article on the Mufti is more than twice as long as the articles on Goebbels and Goring, longer than the articles on Himmler and Heydrich combined, longer than the article on Eichmann — of all the biographical articles, it is exceeded in length, but only slightly, by the entry for Hitler." [Novick, p. 158]

Not only has Yad Vashem attempted through propagandistic means to link the Palestinian struggle to Nazism, it has promoted an exclusivist view of the Holocaust. In April 2009, Yad Vashem fired a docent, Itamar Shapira, because he had discussed the massacre of Palestinians in Deir Yassin with a group of students from the settlement of Efrat. "All I was trying to say is that there were people who lived here before the Holocaust survivors arrived, that they suffered a terrible trauma too, and that we shouldn't hide the facts," Shapira told me a month after his firing. "Yad Vashem carefully selected what facts it wanted to present, but deliberately avoided things like Deir Yassin, even though its ruins were just a thousand meters from the museum."

Iris Rosenberg, a Yad Vashem administrator who was involved in Shapira's firing, said of the verbal assault against Palestinian women at the museum this week: "Despite the regrettable incident at the entrance to the museum, the team's visit to the Holocaust History Museum was conducted in a dignified manner which was significant and important."

Tamara Rabinovitch, the Israeli leader of the Bereaved Families tour, told Walla! that her Palestinian counterparts "were very excited by the visit. Some of them approached me and told me they heard details of the Holocaust but did not know how painful it was. In two weeks we plan to visit an abandoned Arab village so that the Palestinian narrative is represented."

25 December 2010

Nieuwswaarde: drie Italiaanse nonnen omgekomen bij ongeval Israël

Drie Europeanen komen in Israël om het leven door een verkeersongeluk. Dat is volgens persbureau ANP nieuws van waarde voor Nederland. Volgens cijfers van de Israëlische mensenrechtenorganisatie B'tselem, gerekend over 10 jaar, worden er gemiddeld bijna 2 Palestijnen per dag gedood door het Israëlische leger. 98,9% mensen werden op eigen land gedood. 21% waren kinderen.

Drie Italiaanse nonnen zijn vrijdag om het leven gekomen toen ze in Israël met hun auto op het betonnen gedeelte van een elektriciteitspaal reden. ... Het incident had plaats bij Beit Shean in het noorden van Israël, niet ver van de grens met Jordanië. (ANP/Nu.nl)


Beit Shean, 1900

Medio 1948 werd het Palestijnse dorp Beit Shean ingenomen door de joodse terroristen van de Hagana, waarop de bewoners moesten vluchten. Eind 1948 werd het dorp in opdracht van Ben Goerion met de grond gelijk gemaakt. Dit tot grote verontwaardiging van minister Cizling, die de Palestijnse huizen voor joden had bestemd. (Tom Segev, 1949, The First Israelis, p. 68-91) Volgens alle niet-Palestijnse bronnen heeft het Palestijnse dorp nooit bestaan en wordt alleen uitgewijd over de archeologische opgravingen die veel toeristen trekken.


Members of the Haganah (with rifles) "escorting" Palestinian Arabs being expelled from the city of Haifa on May 12, 1948. (AFP picture archive)

Waarom hebben Europeaanse verkeersdoden in Israël nieuwswaarde, en het dagelijkse doden van Palestijnen door Israëli's niet? Omdat in de commerciële massamedia het leven van een Europeaan (of Westerling) belangrijker is dan dat van een Palestijn.

Het Palestinian Centre for Human Rights publiceert o.a. wekelijks rapporten over de activiteiten en mensenrechtenschendingen van het Israëlische leger in bezet gebied. Hieronder een gedeelte van haar laaste rapport.

Weekly Report On Israeli Human Rights Violations in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (16 – 22 December. 2010)

Thursday, 23 December 2010


The Settlers Burn a Flock of Sheep Belonging to a Palestinian in 'Aqraba Village – Nablus

Israeli Occupation Forces (IOF) Continue Systematic Attacks against Palestinian Civilians and Property in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT)

· 5 activist of the Palestinian resistance were killed by IOF in the Gaza Strip.
· Another 4 activists were wounded by Israeli air strikes.

· IOF continued to fire at Palestinian workers, farmers and fishermen in border areas in the Gaza Strip.
- Two Palestinian workers, including a child, and one shepherd were wounded.

· Israeli warplanes attacked a number of targets in the Gaza Strip.
· A factory of dairy products was destroyed in the southern Gaza Strip.
· A house and a grocery were destroyed and another two houses were damaged in Rafah.
· A bird farm was damaged and 1,800 chickens were killed.
· Two sites of the 'Izziddin al-Qassam Brigades (the armed wing of Hamas) were destroyed.

· IOF continued to use force against peaceful protests in the West Bank.
- 5 Palestinian civilians were wounded.
- IOF arrested 5 human rights defenders.

· IOF conducted 34 incursions into Palestinian communities in the West Bank.
- IOF arrested 22 Palestinian civilians, including two children.

· Israel has continued to impose a total siege on the OPT and has isolated the Gaza Strip from the outside world.

· Israel has continued to take measures aimed at creating a Jewish demographic majority in Jerusalem.
- IOF demolished a houses and forced two Palestinian civilians to demolish their houses in Jerusalem.

· IOF have continued settlement activities in the West Bank and Israeli settlers have continued to attack Palestinian civilians and property.
- Israeli settlers attacked two children in Jenin and burnt a cattle of sheep in Nablus.
- IOF demolished a house in Bethlehem and 4 stores in Hebron.
- IOF confiscated 50 donums[1] of land in Beit Eksa village near Jerusalem.

Summary:

Israeli violations of international law and humanitarian law in the OPT continued during the reporting period (16 – 22 December 2010):

Shooting:

During the reporting period, IOF killed 5 activists of the Palestinian resistance and wound 4 others in the Gaza Strip. They also wounded 8 Palestinian civilians, including a child in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank.

On 18 December 2010, an IOF drone fired a missile at a number of activists of the Palestinian resistance in the central Gaza Strip who were attempting to fire home-made rockets into Israel. As a result, 5 activists were killed.

On 20 December 2010, two activists of the Palestinian resistance were wounded when Israeli warplanes bombarded a site of the 'Izziddin al-Qassam Brigades (the armed wing of Hamas) in Khan Yunis. On 21 December 2010, another two activists were wounded when Israeli warplanes bombarded another site in Rafah.

During the reporting period, IOF fired at Palestinian workers who were collecting scraps of construction materials. As a result, two workers, including a child, were wounded by Israeli gunfire.

On 19 December 2010, a Palestinian shepherd was wounded by Israeli gunfire in the northern Gaza Strip.

During the reporting period, Israeli warplanes attacked a number of targets in the Gaza Strip. As a result, a factory of dairy products, a house, a grocery and two paramilitary sites were destroyed and two houses and a bird farm were damaged. Additionally, 1,800 chickens were killed.

During the reporting period, IOF used excessive force to disperse peaceful demonstrations organized in protest to Israeli settlement activities and the construction of the annexation wall. As a result, 5 Palestinian civilians were wounded, and dozens of Palestinian civilians and international human rights defenders suffered from tear gas inhalation or sustained bruises. IOF also arrested 3 Israeli human rights defenders and two international ones.

Incursions:

During the reporting period, IOF conducted at least 34 military incursions into Palestinian communities in the West Bank, during which they arrested 22 Palestinian civilians, including two children.

Restrictions on Movement:

Israel had continued to impose a tightened siege on the OPT and imposed severe restrictions on the movement of Palestinian civilians in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank, including occupied East Jerusalem 

» Lees het hele rapport

Jesus was Palestinian and why it matters

Ma'an News Agency | By Jehanzeb Dar | 25.12.10


Because of modern alarmist reactions to the word “Palestine,” many non-Arabs and non-Muslims take offense when it is argued that Jesus was a Palestinian (peace be upon him).

Jesus’ ethnicity, skin color, and culture often accompany this conversation, but few people are willing to acknowledge the fact he was non-European. A simple stroll down the Christmas aisle will show you the dominant depiction of Jesus: a blonde-haired, blue-eyed, white man.

Islamophobia and anti-Arab propaganda have conditioned us to view Palestinians as nothing but heartless suicide bombers, “terrorists,” and “enemies of freedom and democracy.” Perpetual media vilification and demonization of Palestinians, in contrast to the glorification of Israel, obstructs us from seeing serious issues such as the Palestinian refugee crisis, the victims of Israel’s atrocious three-week assault on Gaza during the winter of 2008-2009, the tens of thousands of homeless Palestinians, and many other struggles that are constantly addressed by human rights activists around the world.

To speak from the perspective of the Palestinians, especially in casual non-Arab and non-Muslim settings, generates controversy because of the alignment between Palestinians and violent stereotypes. So, how could Jesus belong to a group of people that we’re taught to dehumanize?

When I’ve spoken to people about this, I’ve noticed the following responses: “No, Jesus was a Jew,” or “Jesus is not Muslim.” The mistake isn’t a surprise to me, but it certainly is revealing. Being a Palestinian does not mean one is Muslim or vice versa. Prior to the brutal and unjust dispossession of indigenous Palestinians during the creation of the state of Israel, the word “Palestine” was a geographic term applied to Palestinian Muslims, Palestinian Christians, and Palestinian Jews. Although most Palestinians are Muslim today, there is a significant Palestinian Christian minority who are often overlooked, especially by the mainstream Western media.

That dominant narrative not only distorts and misrepresents the Palestinian struggle as a religious conflict between “Muslims and Jews,” but consequentially pushes the lives of Palestinian Christians into “non-existence.” That is, due to the media's reluctance to report the experiences and stories of Palestinian Christians, it isn’t a surprise when white Americans are astonished by the fact that Palestinian and Arab Christians do, in fact, exist. One could argue that the very existence of Palestinian Christians is threatening, as it disrupts the sweeping and overly-simplistic “Muslim vs. Jew” Zionist narrative. To learn about many Palestinian Christians opposing Israeli military occupation, as well as Jews who oppose the occupation, is to reveal more voices, perspectives, and complexities to a conflict that has been immensely portrayed as one-sided, anti-Palestinian, and anti-Muslim.

Yeshua (Jesus’ real Aramaic name) was born in Bethlehem, a Palestinian city in the West Bank and home to one of the largest Palestinian Christian communities. The Church of the Nativity, one of the oldest churches in the world, marks the birthplace of Jesus and is sacred to both Christians and Muslims. While tourists from the around the world visit the site, they are subject to Israeli checkpoints and roadblocks. The Israeli construction of the West Bank barrier also severely restricts travel for local Palestinians. In April of 2010, Israeli authorities barred Palestinian Christians from entering Jerusalem and visiting the Church of Holy Sepulchre during Easter. Yosef Zabaneh, a Palestinian Christian merchant in Ramallah, said: “The Israeli occupation in Gaza and the West Bank doesn't distinguish between us, but treats all Palestinians with contempt.”

Zabaneh’s comments allude to the persistent dehumanization of Palestinians, as well as the erasure of Palestinians, both Christians and Muslims. By constantly casting Palestinians as the villains, even the term “Palestine” becomes “evil.” There is refusal to recognize, for example, that the word “Palestine” was used as early as the 5th century BCE by the ancient Greek historian Herodotus. John Bimson, author of “The Compact Handbook of Old Testament Life,” acknowledges the objection to the use of “Palestine”:

The term ‘Palestine’ is derived from the Philistines. In the fifth century BC the Greek historian Herodotus seems to have used the term Palaistine Syria (= Philistine Syria) to refer to the whole region between Phoenicia and the Lebanon mountains in the north and Egypt in the south… Today the name “Palestine” has political overtones which many find objectionable, and for that reason some writers deliberately avoid using it. However, the alternatives are either too clumsy to be used repeatedly or else they are inaccurate when applied to certain periods, so “Palestine” remains a useful term…

Deliberately avoiding the use of the name “Palestine” not only misrepresents history, but also reinforces anti-Palestinian racism as acceptable. When one examines the argument against Jesus being a Palestinian, one detects a remarkable amount of hostility aimed at both Palestinians and Muslims. One cannot help but wonder, is there something threatening about identifying Jesus as a Palestinian? Professor Jack D. Forbes writes about Jesus’ multi-cultural and multi-ethnic environment:

When the Romans came to dominate the area, they used the name Palestine. Thus, when Yehoshu'a [Jesus] was born, he was born a Palestinian as were all of the inhabitants of the region, Jews and non-Jews. He was also a Nazarene (being born in Nazareth) and a Galilean (born in the region of Galilee)… At the time of Yehoshu'a's birth, Palestine was inhabited by Jews-descendants of Hebrews, Canaanites, and many other Semitic peoples-and also by Phoenicians, Syrians, Greeks, and even Arabs.

Despite these facts, there are those who use the color-blind argument: “It does not matter what Jesus’ ethnicity or skin color was. It does not matter what language he spoke. Jesus is for all people, whether you’re black, white, brown, yellow, etc.” While this is a well-intentioned expression of inclusiveness and universalism, it misses the point.



When we see so many depictions of Jesus as a Euro-American white man, the ethnocentrism and race-bending needs to be called out. In respect to language, for instance, Neil Douglas-Klotz, author of “The Hidden Gospel: Decoding the Spiritual Message of the Aramaic Jesus,” emphasizes the importance of understanding that Jesus spoke Aramaic, not English, and that his words, as well as his worldview, must be understood in light of Middle Eastern language and spirituality. Douglas-Klotz provides an interesting example which reminds me of the rich depth and meaning of Arabic, Urdu, and Farsi words, especially the word for “spirit”:

Whenever a saying of Jesus refers to spirit, we must remember that he would have used an Aramaic or Hebrew word. In both of these languages, the same word stands for spirit, breath, air, and wind. So ‘Holy Spirit’ must also be ‘Holy Breath.’ The duality between spirit and body, which we often take for granted in our Western languages falls away. If Jesus made the famous statement about speaking or sinning against the Holy Spirit (for instance, in Luke 12:10), then somehow the Middle Eastern concept of breath is also involved.

Certainly, no person is superior to another based on culture, language, or skin color, but to ignore the way Jesus’ whiteness has been used to subjugate and discriminate against racial minorities in the West and many other countries is to overlook another important aspect of Jesus’ teachings: Love thy neighbor as thyself. Malcolm X wrote about white supremacists and slave-owners using Christianity to justify their “moral” and “racial superiority” over blacks. In Malcolm’s own words, “The Holy Bible in the White man's hands and its interpretations of it have been the greatest single ideological weapon for enslaving millions of non-white human beings.” Throughout history, whether it was in Jerusalem, Spain, India, Africa, or in the Americas, white so-called “Christians” cultivated a distorted interpretation of religion that was compatible with their racist, colonialist agenda.

And here we are in the 21st century where Islamophobia (also stemming from racism because the religion of Islam gets racialized) is on the rise; where people calling themselves “Christian” fear to have a black president; where members of the KKK and anti-immigration movements behave as if Jesus were an intolerant white American racist who only spoke English despite being born in the Middle East. It is astonishing how so-called “Christians” like Ann Coulter call Muslims “rag-heads” when in actuality, Jesus himself would fit the profile of a “rag-head,” too. As would Moses, Joseph, Abraham, and the rest of the Prophets (peace be upon them all). As William Rivers Pitt writes:

The ugly truth which never even occurs to most Americans is that Jesus looked a lot more like an Iraqi, like an Afghani, like a Palestinian, like an Arab, than any of the paintings which grace the walls of American churches from sea to shining sea. This was an uncomfortable fact before September 11. After the attack, it became almost a moral imperative to put as much distance between Americans and people from the Middle East as possible. Now, to suggest that Jesus shared a genealogical heritage and physical similarity to the people sitting in dog cages down in Guantanamo is to dance along the edge of treason.

Without acknowledging Jesus as a native Middle Eastern person — a Palestinian — who spoke Aramaic — a Semitic language that is ancestral to Arabic and Hebrew — the West will continue to view Islam as a “foreign religion.” Hate crimes and discriminatory acts against Muslims, Arabs, and others who are perceived to be Muslim will persist. They will still be treated as “cultural outsiders.” Interesting enough, Christianity and Judaism are never considered “foreign religions,” despite having Middle Eastern origins, like Islam. As Douglas-Klotz insists, affirming Jesus as a native Middle Eastern person “enables Christians to understand that the mind and message” of Jesus arises from “the same earth as have the traditions of their Jewish and Muslim sisters and brothers.”

Jesus would not prefer one race or group of people over another. I believe he would condemn today’s demonization and dehumanization of the Palestinian people, as well as the misrepresentations of him that only fuel ignorance and ethnocentrism. As a Muslim, I believe Jesus was a prophet of God, and if I were to have any say about the Christmas spirit, it would be based on Jesus’ character: humility, compassion, and Love. A love in which all people, regardless of ethnicity, race, culture, religion, gender, and sexual orientation are respected and appreciated.

And in that spirit, I wish you a merry Christmas. Alaha Natarak (Aramaic: God be with you).

The author blogs at Muslim Reverie. He recently wrote a chapter in "Teaching Against Islamophobia" on the demonization of Muslims and Arabs in mainstream American comics.

24 December 2010

Het racisme van Rob Vreeken

"Vergeet niet dat de Syriërs Arabieren zijn: een hoop poeha om de mannelijke eer te redden, maar als het erop aankomt springen ze kermend op hun kameel – hun ware geheime wapen."

(Volkskrant 26/04/08)

23 December 2010

Prettige feestdagen in Israël

Tweehonderd joden in Bat Yam roepen dat joodse vrouwen die met "Arabische" mannen omgaan gedood moeten worden. De burgemeester van Nazareth Illit verbiedt kerstbomen die christelijke inwoners willen neerzetten: "Zolang ik hier de lakens uitdeel, worden er hier geen kerstbomen of andere niet-joodse symbolen neergezet." Gewelddadige aanvallen op Afrikaanse migranten nemen toe.
Israël gaat aan zichzelf ten onder.

Israel's Sham Democracy

By Stephen Lendman | December 19, 2010

Numerous previous articles exposed it, highlighting policies affording rights solely to Jews, including a January 2010 Israeli Democracy or Hypocrisy one accessed through the following link:

http://sjlendman.blogspot.com/2010/01/israeli-democracy-or-hypocrisy.html

It cited a same titled October 2007 Haaretz editorial, calling for "debate about Israel's control over the lives of Palestinians deprived of civil rights," saying its democracy is flawed for denying Arab Israelis equality with Jews.

In his December 10 op-ed titled titled, "The farce of a secular and democratic Jewish state," Haaretz writer Gideon Levy was equally critical, saying:

"The debate over the conversion bill is deceptive." The IDF bill aims to prevent municipal marriage clerks from refusing to register marriages of people converted during military service. An estimated 2,500 occur annually, mostly among former Soviet Union immigrants. Orthodox parties, like Shas, want the Sephardic chief rabbi to have sole conversion authority. Secular ones want bill's language left unchanged.

Levy believes the debate masks greater issues, fundamental ones "that define our society and state." Whether military or civilian rabbis decide who is Jewish is a distraction. "Ten times more significant is....whether (we're) living in the only country on earth where clerics determine the right to citizenship. No less important (is the illusion that Israel) is a secular and democratic state."

Imagine debates over whether to rent apartments to Arabs. What about equal rights, democratic freedoms, civil liberties and justice. Choosing who's superior, who's inferior, who gets rights and who doesn't exposes Israel's real agenda, a theocratic-run Jewish state under religious law, deciding who belongs and who doesn't, enforced by hardline officials and MKs.

"It's time to admit that this approach can only be called racist," based on "the blood flowing through (one's) veins....determin(ing) your status....Sixty-two years after (Israel's) establishment, (it's time to) change this reality."

It's time for "normalcy, for joining the enlightened world, (and changing) distorted reality." Otherwise, it's ludicrous calling Israel "a liberal and modern state" when growing despotism better defines it. Non-Jews have experienced it for decades, under a repressive occupation, and Israeli Arabs treated like second class citizens.

On December 17, the Adalah Legal Center for Arab Minority Rights in Israel said a new report lists 20 new Knesset laws and draft laws that discriminate against Arab minorities, threatening their rights as citizens. In some cases, Occupied Palestinian rights are also violated.

For example, a recently proposed Knesset "Bill for Protecting the Values of the State of Israel (Amendment Legislation) 2009 requires organizations pledge loyalty to Israel as "Jewish and democratic." In a November 4 press release, Adalah said the bill:

"violates the right of freedom of association and freedom of expression of all Arab organizations in Israel, which seek through democratic means to change the political, legal and social status in Israel. It asks those organizations to express their loyalty to the Jewish state and therefore it is not just a discriminatory law but one that seeks to oppress the rights of the Arab minority."

It also limits and damages Arab organizations' work, "put(ting) them under ultra-nationalist, ideological interrogation and investigation, and (questioning) every serious action" they take. The bill enforces a Jewish world view, delegitimizing and perhaps criminalizing organizations not endorsing it. This and other bills mirror 1920s Italy and 1930s Germany where democracy became fascism, including racist laws, persecution and extermination.

Institutionalizing Apartheid in Israel

On October 29, Haaretz writer Amnon Be'eri-Sulitzeanu headlined, "Segregation of Jews and Arabs in 2010 Israel is almost absolute," saying:

The Knesset's "Amendment to the Cooperative Associations Bill" bypasses High Court rulings in favor of instituting apartheid law.

Ten years ago, Israel's Supreme Court "ordered the town of Katzir to accept the family of Adel and Iman Kaadan, Arab citizens of Israel, as members of the community. Seven years later," the Court again ruled against the Rakefet Galilee village. Like Katzir, it's Jewish, ordered not to discriminate against Arab citizens. The Knesset amendment, however, lets communal village acceptance committees limit residency exclusively to Jews, rejecting families that "are incompatible with the social-cultural fabric of our community, and where there are grounds to assume that they will disrupt the fabric."

In other words, non-Jews are barred to let communities preserve Jewish traditions. Earlier, anticipating the Knesset action, communities like Yuvalim and Manof, in the Misgav area, mandated residence based on declaring allegiance to the Zionist vision. In Mitzpe Aviv, applicants must openly identify with Zionist values and the notion of Israel as a Jewish, democratic state.

In addition, in Upper Nazareth, Safed and Carmiel, senior municipal officials call for dispossessing Arabs or preventing their integration into the communities.

As a result, "Segregation of Jews and Arabs in Israel in 2010 is almost complete." Resident Jews take it for granted. Visitors, however, can't "believe their eyes: segregated education, segregated businesses, separate entertainment venues, different languages, separate political parties, (and) segregated housing..contribut(ing) to the growing mutual alienation of Jews and Arabs." In other words, Jim Crow in the extreme, including violence and intimidation.

To Israel's shame, segregation remains de jure, legislated apartheid expected to pass its final version and become official in the weeks ahead. It already is in practice despite High Court rulings prohibiting the practice. The racist Knesset and Netanyahu government pay no attention, doing what they please with or without legal right.

Under present and past governments, core Judaization policy is a dagger against minority Arab rights, dispossessing or prohibiting them from land Israel wants exclusively for Jews. Cooperative associations limited to 500 families effectively enforce this policy, limiting Arab citizens to shrinking areas, comprising about 2.5% of Israel. Eventually it may all be lost for total Judaization. In addition, all valued West Bank and East Jerusalem land may be seized, confining Palestinians to resource-poor, cantonized scrub lands.

On December 16, Haaretz writers Jack Khoury and Jonathan Lis headlined, "Israeli towns continue to rewrite bylaws to keep Arabs out," saying:

Circumventing Knesset and High Court actions, Jewish "communities are....rewriting admission regulations in order to 'preserve their Jewish and Zionist character.' " The idea, of course, is to prohibit Arabs and other unwanted residents.

A Misgav Regional Council proposal describes the "multigenerational and variegated communal life that upholds Zionist values and seeks to maintain Israel as a Jewish and democratic state in the spirit of (Israel's 1948) Declaration of Independence."

The document also mentions community values "based on tolerance, human dignity and reciprocal relations among members, who pursue a communal lifestyle in an independent, democratic and voluntary manner." Those values, however, are racist, excluding anyone not Jewish, putting a lie to sham language without meaning.

On December 26, Israel's High Court will decide whether Ahmed and Fatin Zbeidat may live in the Rakafet communal settlement, barring Arabs from residency. As in the past, however, Jewish communities may bypass Court rulings, a testimony to Israel's institutionalized racism.

Rabbis Endorsing Racism

Racist rabbis affirm it, including leading ones wanting renting homes to Arabs prohibited. Dozens of municipal chief rabbis endorsed a religious ruling to do so, claiming Israel belongs to Jews, not goyim, especially Arabs.

Beit El settlement's Rabbi Shlomo Aviner said, "We don't need to help Arabs set down roots in Israel." According to Rabbi Yosef Scheinen, head of Ashdod's Yeshiva, "Racism originated in the Torah. The land of Israel is designated for the people of Israel. This is what Holy One Blessed Be he intended, and that is what the (sage) Rashi interpreted." God intended Israel for Jews, he added, a notion only bigoted hatemonger ones endorse. Doing so should get them suspended, denounced and prohibited from distorting true Jewish dogma, teaching love, not hate, like Islam.

No shred of evidence exists that Torah or Talmudic doctrine sanction racism or any other form of hate. Even Haifa's Mayor Yonah Yahav was outraged, calling the ruling a "desecration of God's name." Nazareth Mayor Ramiz Jaraisy said, "We are all children of the land. Both (sides) must search for common ground and not bring out escalation." The rabbis, however, urged "neighbors and acquaintances (of Jews who rent or sell to Arabs to) distance themselves (from them), refrain from doing business with (them), deny (them) the right to read from the Torah, and (ostracize them) until (they retract) this harmful deed."

Racist rabbis offer more proof of Israel's sham democracy. Most disturbing, however, is the extremist Netanyahu government, support or no dissent from opposition leaders, and Israel's most right-wing ever Knesset, flouting democratic principles one law or edict at a time. It endorses, but hasn't yet passed, measures like Israel's Law of Citizenship amendment, requiring non-Jews wanting it to pledge loyalty to "the State of Israel as a Jewish and democratic state."

On October 10, Netanyahu's cabinet approved it (22 - 8) for new non-Jewish citizens. He, Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman, other Knesset hard-liners, and MK religious zealots support it.

The Association for Civil Rights in Israel (ACRI) expressed concern about increasing anti-democratic Knesset measures proposed or passed. They're "gaining momentum and, regrettably" the new session may be worse, though at times, language in original submissions is softened.

The last session was notably anti-democratic. If this one's no different, enormous damage will be done. Apparently it's Israel's chosen course, harming Arabs most of all.

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net. Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.

17 December 2010

Trouw: Marokkaanse meisjes hebben "meer begrip voor het Joodse lijden"

In het huidige antisemitismedebat begint elke grip op de werkelijkheid en rationaliteit te verdwijnen. In Trouw reageert chef binnenland Maaike van Houten op een schrijven in Trouw van de Nederlandse schrijver Abdelkader Benali, die het probleem van antisemitisme onder Marokkaanse jongens bespreekt. Hij schreef onder meer:

"Veel [Marokkaanse] meisjes hebben het dagboek van Anne Frank gelezen en hebben begrip voor het joodse lijden. Ze weten meer van de geschiedenis en hebben in ieder geval oog voor de menselijke kant van elk conflict. Ze zijn geloofwaardig."

Ik ben daar niet bekend mee, maar ik neem dat gerust aan. Enter Maaike van Houten:

"De schrijver Abdelkader Benali adviseerde gisteren op Podium Marokkaanse meisjes thuis en op school in te zetten om antisemitisme onder Marokkaanse jongens te bestrijden. Zij hebben, zegt Benali, meer begrip voor het Joodse lijden. Is zijn voorstel reëel?"

Allereerst, en niet onbelangrijk, herschrijft Van Houten wat Benali schreef: "het joodse lijden" vertaalt zij veelbetekenend naar "het Joodse lijden". Benali heeft het over religie, maar Van Houten 'het Joodse volk'. Dat joden een volk zouden zijn, is gebaseerd op een zionistische mythe, zo betoogt o.a. de Israëlische historicus Schlomo Sand. De joden zijn eerder een kleurrijke mix van groepen die op verschillende tijdstippen in de geschiedenis het Joodse geloof aannamen. Sand beargumenteerde ook dat bij een aantal zionistische ideologen de mythische perceptie van de Joden als een oud volk heeft geleid tot een racistisch denken (Wikipedia). Wat Benali schrijft is blijkbaar ondergeschikt aan de zionistische ideologie, zo moet Van Houten geredeneerd hebben, en greep zij naar het redactionele rode potlood.

Nog veel merkwaardiger is dat Van Houten, daar waar Benali over "het joodse lijden" spreekt met betrekking tot de holocaust, "het Joodse lijden" in de tegenwoordige tijd plaatst, en het met het hedendaagse antisemitisme presenteert. Zij suggereert dat de joden in Nederland nog steeds "lijden".

Gisteren werd negende rapportage Monitor Racisme & Extremisme van de Anne Frank Stichting gepresenteerd:

"Bij de inventarisatie over 2009 was in 81 gevallen van racistische geweldpleging voldoende informatie voorhanden om de autochtone dan wel allochtone identiteit van de vermoedelijke daders te kunnen benoemen: in 70 gevallen waren de daders autochtonen en in 11 gevallen allochtonen. Bij het antisemitische geweld vonden de onderzoekers in 2009 bij een van de 18 incidenten een allochtone dader en bij twee een autochtone. Bij de 52 incidenten tegen moslims waren alle bekende daders van autochtone afkomst." (rnw.nl)

In Trouw mag Ronny Naftaniël van het CIDI ook weer een duit in het zakje doen. Dat het nogal vreemd is dat een instituut, dat vooraleerst een lobbygroep voor en woordvoerder van Israël is, zich doorlopend met onze binnenlands beleid bemoeit, via de christelijke politici en andere "vrienden van Israël", schijnt voor niemand een serieus probleem te zijn. Naftaniël komt in Trouw met een voorbeeld waaruit je kunt concluderen dat wanneer je iemand lastig valt, maar die blijkt zonder dat je dat weet ('herkenbaar' is) joods te zijn, dat dat ook een 'antisemitisch incident' is. Welnu, zou ik een joodse zijn geweest, met alle incidenten die ik heb meegemaakt in mijn leven, van naroepen tot klappen krijgen, dan zou het bijna logisch worden ik als jood in Nederland "lijd". En mijns inziens werkt de angstpropaganda van de (zelfbenoemde) vertegenwoordigers van joden in Nederland langzaam en gestaag naar dat idee toe. Natuurlijk niet omdat er een tweede holocaust op de stoep zou staan, maar omdat een exclusief joods slachtofferschap de politieke belangen van "de Joodse staat" dient, en zeker ook de politieke agenda van onze islamofobe (lobby-)groepen en partijen.

Henry Siegman, 17 jaar directeur van het American Jewish Congress en huidig directeur van het U.S./Middle East Project schreef in 2009 in de New York Times over het joodse slachtofferschap:

"The Israeli reaction to serious peacemaking efforts is nothing less than pathological — the consequence of an inability to adjust to the Jewish people’s reentry into history with a state of their own following 2,000 years of powerlessness and victimhood.

Former Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, whose assassination by a Jewish right-wing extremist is being remembered this week in Israel, told Israelis at his inauguration in 1992 that their country is militarily powerful, and neither friendless nor at risk. They should therefore stop thinking and acting like victims.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s message that the whole world is against Israel and that Israelis are at risk of another Holocaust — a fear he invoked repeatedly during his address in September at the United Nations General Assembly in order to discredit Judge Richard Goldstone’s Gaza fact-finding report — is unfortunately still a more comforting message for too many Israelis.

This pathology has been aided and abetted by American Jewish organizations whose agendas conform to the political and ideological views of Israel’s right wing. These organizations do not reflect the views of most American Jews who voted overwhelmingly — nearly 80 percent — for Mr. Obama in the presidential elections."

De Racisme Monitor meldde overigens nog een opmerkelijk feit, dat we van de (zelfbenoemde) joodse woordvoerders nooit te horen krijgen: er zijn in Nederland ongeveer 7000 praktiserende joden - op een totaal van 50.000 joden. Dat betekent dat slechts 14% van de joodse Nederlanders (geregistreerd?) religieus zijn. En nog een kleiner aantal (van de mannen) daarvan zal "herkenbaar" zijn door het dragen van een keppel. En nog een kleiner aantal daarvan zal met antisemitisme geconfronteerd worden. Natuurlijk is antisemitisme een abject en te veroordelen kwaad. Maar niet meer of minder dan islamofobie en ander racisme. Toch wordt het antisemitisme tegenwoordig bijna dagelijks gehyped - maar het inmiddels tot in Haagse kringen toe gelegitimeerde haatzaaien tegen moslims en islam, met Marokkanen met stip op een, is in de praktijk geen probleem. En dat is een gevaarlijk probleem.

16 December 2010

'Israël is van slachtoffer dader aan het worden'

Weer een voorbeeld van hoe de werkelijkheid de zaken in een normaal perspectief plaatst. United Civilians for Peace moet maar een reisbureau beginnen, Vrienden van Israël Tours - Welcome to Reality.

Siebelink: 'Israël is van slachtoffer dader aan het worden'

De schrijvers Rosita Steenbeek, Jan Siebelink, Frans Thomése en Antoine Bodar reisden van 6 tot en met 10 december door Israël en de bezette Palestijnse gebieden. Bodar: 'Mijn beeld is veranderd.'

Wereldjournalisten | 16 december 2010


De schrijvers Rosita Steenbeek, Jan Siebelink, Frans Thomése en Antoine Bodar reisden van 6 tot en met 10 december door Bethlehem, Hebron, Ramallah, Jeruzalem, Gaza en Tel Aviv. Zij deden dit op uitnodiging van United Civilians voor Peace (UCP) een organisatie die zich inzet voor een rechtvaardige en vreedzame oplossing van de Israëlisch-Palestijnse kwestie waarbij de rechten en belangen van burgers centraal staan.

Volgens het CIDI is UCP een anti-Israëlische organisatie. Antoine Bodar en Jan Siebelink te gast op radio 1 ontkennen deze aantijging. De deelnemers aan de reis hebben ontmoetingen gehad met mensenrechtenactivisten, oud-soldaten, theologen en 'gewone burgers in Israël en de bezette gebieden. De nadruk lag tijdens de reis op de impact van de bezetting op de levens van gewone mensen.

Sprookje van de Olijfberg
Siebelink ging in op het verzoek van UCP omdat hij zich verbonden voelt met Israël en het 'sprookje van de Olijfberg' met eigen ogen wilde zien. Siebelink is onthutst van de reis teruggekomen. 'Wij hebben vaak gezien dat mensen worden gejend en getreiterd.' De vijandige bejegening van Palestijnen vond hij stuitend. Vooral wanneer het gaat om jonge vrouwen en mannen van 18 jaar die oudere Palestijnen afsnauwen.
De grove bejegening van Palestijnen vindt ook Bodar opvallend. Zeker omdat zijzelf anders werden behandeld tijdens de reis, zo vertellen Siebelink en Bodar. Zo mochten zij in de auto de grensovergang oversteken terwijl hun Palestijns-Nederlandse begeleider uit moest stappen en alleen lopend de grens moest overgaan. Uit protest voegde de Nederlandse bezoekers zich bij de volgende grensovergang in de rij van wachtende Palestijnen. Bodar: 'Toen we ontdekt werden, ging de rij opeens snel.'

Het Derde Rijk
Bodar: 'Mijn beeld is veranderd. Het beeld is dat Israël omringd wordt door Palestijnse terroristen, maar niet iedereen in de bezette gebieden is bezig met terrorisme.' Ook het grote verschil in welvaart tussen Israël en de bezette gebieden is Bodar opgevallen. Bodar verwijst naar de situatie in de bezette gebieden als een 'open lucht gevangenis'.
Opmerkelijk vond Bodar een ontmoeting met Joodse mensen die stelden dat heel Israël exclusief aan Israël toebehoort. In hun ogen was er geen plek voor andere volken dan het Joodse in Israël.

In een artikel in het Nederlands Dagblad vergeleek Bodar toestanden in de bezette gebieden met het Derde Rijk. Bodar staat daar nog steeds achter: 'Het gaat om de oorlogssfeer die er hangt. Hoe mensen bejegend wordt. Het is alleen maar treiteren. Je hebt ook A-, B-, C-Palestijnen. Palestijnen worden heel goed gecategoriseerd.' Bodar benadrukt dat wanneer hij zich uitspreekt voor de rechten van de Palestijnen dat niet wil zeggen dat hij anti-Israël is. Siebelink: 'Israël is ooit slachtoffer geweest. Ze zijn nu dader aan het worden.'

Op verzoek van de NCRV hielden de vier schrijvers een dagboek bij, waaruit in de tv-uitzending 'Altijd wat' op vrijdag 17 december om 20.55u (Nederland 2) fragmenten zullen worden vertoond.

15 December 2010

Cohen: moslims worden buitengesloten, zoals Joden in de oorlog

Iedereen die zich ingelezen heeft over hoe de NSDAP in de jaren '30 antisemitische propaganda heeft gevoerd zal moeten beamen wat Cohen zegt. De nazi's gebruikten soms exact dezelfde terminologie, zoals een 'vloedgolf' (tsunami) van joden over Europa, dat de joden weigerden om te integreren, vijfde kolonne, etc. Maar net als met de nazi's collaboreren we wederom, net zo lang tot wijzelf aan de beurt zijn.


Provinciale Overijsselsche en Zwolsche courant (21 juni 1940). Hoofdredacteur Albert van de Poel was voor de oorlog al Duitsgezind, en werd lid van de 'Raad van Voorlichting der Nederlandsche Pers' (RvV) die na de bezetting door de NSB werd opgericht om de Nederlandse anti-nationaal-socialistische media te beinvloeden en journalisten te intimideren. In 1941 werd de RvV ingelijfd in de Nederlandse Kuturkammer.

Cohen: moslims worden buitengesloten, zoals Joden in de oorlog

Vrij Nederland | 15 december 2010


Job Cohen vindt dat moslims in Nederland worden buitengesloten zoals de Joden rond het begin van de Tweede Wereldoorlog. Dat zegt hij in het winternummer van Vrij Nederland.

De PvdA-leider vertelt hoe zijn Joodse moeder rond het uitbreken van de oorlog meemaakte hoe Joden langzamerhand werden buitengesloten. Dat ziet hij nu weer gebeuren, maar dan met de moslims: ‘Praat met de mensen en je hoort het. Ik heb als burgemeester van Amsterdam ook gezegd: ik wil de boel bij elkaar houden. Sindsdien is het alleen maar urgenter geworden. De PVV zegt gewoon tegen moslims: we willen liever dat jullie weggaan. Maar je kunt dé islam niet de schuld geven van het extremisme. Er zijn zoveel moslims die gewoon huisje-boompje-beestje willen en niks anders. Die mensen worden er nu bang van dat Wilders deel uitmaakt van de macht.’

'Gedoogkabinet is te wijten aan Ruud Lubbers'
Verder zegt Cohen dat de totstandkoming van het VVD-CDA-kabinet met gedoogsteun van de PVV te wijten is aan toenmalig informateur Ruud Lubbers. ‘Lubbers is gewoon zijn boekje te buiten gegaan,’ aldus Cohen. ‘Wie was er de baas? Wie was er informateur? Lubbers had gewoon terug moeten gaan naar de koningin. Heeft hij niet gedaan. Dat is een cruciaal moment geweest.’

‘CDA schaamt zich voor de PVV’
Ook heeft Cohen felle kritiek op het CDA. In die partij wordt gezegd dat Cohen de christen-democraten in de armen van de PVV heeft gedreven door zijn afwijzing van een middenkabinet met VVD en CDA. 'Onzin', zegt Cohen. ‘Dat is alleen maar omdat ze zich schamen dat ze met de PVV zijn gaan samenwerken. Nou, dat ligt niet aan mij, dat ligt aan hen. Ik heb vanaf het allereerste moment gezegd: niemand hóéft met Wilders te regeren.’

In het interview spreekt Cohen ook over zijn diepe teleurstelling dat hij er niet in is geslaagd Wilders buiten de macht te houden. 'Ik héb hem niet tegengehouden. Dat is al treurig genoeg.' Maar aan hemzelf heeft het niet gelegen, vindt de PvdA-leider, ondanks de moeizame verkiezingscampagne: 'Ik heb mijn best gedaan.'


Tekening van Yung in De Telegraaf van 15 mei 1940.

11 December 2010

Eeuwenoud, springlevend: De ziekte van Nederland

De column - zeg maar monoloog - van de Leuvense burgemeester, minister van staat en grand old man van het Vlaams socialisme verschijnt wekelijks op vrijdag. Louis Tobback spreekt, Walter Pauli tekent op.

De Morgen | 10 december 2010


"Ik was oprecht geschokt toen ik las dat Frits Bolkestein de Joden aanraadde om vanuit Nederland naar Israël en de VS te verhuizen, de enige landen waar ze beschermd zouden zijn tegen moslims. Ik heb Bolkestein altijd gezien als een rechtse, conservatieve liberaal. Maar nog altijd een liberaal. Ik heb me blijkbaar vergist.

"Bolkestein zal volhouden dat hij geen racist is. Ik geloof hem. Maar hij verspreidt populisme en paniek. Hij dedouaneert Wilders en zijn zootje. Door te mikken op de islam in plaats van op 'ras', hoeven die niet te zeggen dat iedereen met kroeshaar en donkere huid gevaarlijk is. Dat men in de Leuvense stationscafés dwaasheden verkoopt, tot daar aan toe. Als Bolkestein toogpraat opblinkt tot een serieus discours, is dat onrustwekkend.

"Het wijst ook op een graad van ontbinding van de Nederlandse samenleving. Heel Nederland dekt dit beschamende incident toe met de mantel der liefde. Waar is de grote verontwaardiging? Het NRC, nochtans een bastion van liberaal vrijheidsdenken, wilde er geen zaak van maken. Men vergist zich. Het puistje op mijn arm is niet belangrijk. Behalve als het een teken is van een algemene bloedvergiftiging. Bolkestein is niet meer zo belangrijk als politicus, maar wel als symptoom.

"Ook in België stel ik vast dat eminente intellectuelen en progressieven zich grote zorgen maken over 'de islam'. Maar ik hoor ze zich amper afvragen waarom dat probleem van moslimfundamentalisme zich altijd stelt in Schaarbeek, Anderlecht of Molenbeek, en nauwelijks in Ukkel, Bosvoorde of de betere buurten van Elsene? Zou er zelfs in Algerije misschien een verband zijn tussen de fanatieke moslim en de arme moslim? De vraag stellen is ze beantwoorden. Ja, natuurlijk is er een band tussen marginalisering, criminaliteit en radicalisme. Dat is het cruciale probleem, niet de islam an sich. Toch gaat de anti-islamboodschap er gemakkelijk in. Ook bij de Joodse gemeenschap, zo merk ik. Het is een tegennatuurlijk bondgenootschap: Dewinter die vanaf het strand bij Gaza Israël uitroept tot een bolwerk van de westerse beschaving tegen het oprukkende moslimfundamentalisme, en daarvoor tot in de Joodse gemeenschap applaus krijgt.

"Maar die attitude mag je niet bekritiseren. Je mag zelfs niet opmerken dat het regent boven Jeruzalem of je riskeert het verwijt van antisemitisme. Dan krijg je de Freilichen over je heen. Dus bibber ik van angst en zwijg. Toch wil ik de Joodse gemeenschap blijven waarschuwen voor slechte vrienden.

"En het belet me niet om te blijven opkomen voor het recht voor moslims om hun godsdienst te beleven. Al keur ik daarom nog geen praktijken goed zoals het achterstellen van vrouwen. Net zoals ik geen getuige van Jehova ben, en hen toch niets in de weg zal leggen, zolang ze maar niet beletten dat hun kind een bloedtransfusie krijgt. Piet Vermeylen zei al: 'Ik ben geen vrouw, maar ik verdedig de rechten van vrouwen.' Ik verdedig dus de godsdienstvrijheid. Maar dergelijke begrippen zijn aan het verdwijnen in de Nederlandse politieke cultuur. Het land is zijn zelfvertrouwen kwijt.

"Het gaat dus niet alleen over de PVV. Door Wilders belachelijk te maken is de ziekte van het land niet weg. Je stopt de bloedvergiftiging niet door dat puistje weg te krabben. Het zal nog lang duren voor de vanzelfsprekendheid van een aantal democratische waarden terug is.

"Zeker als politici en partijen die beter zouden moeten weten zich van die populistische technieken bedienen. Vroeger was er vooral afgunst voor vreemdelingen. Sinds de financiële crisis kwam er ook angst bij: 'Ze gaan mij straks nog afpakken wat ik heb.' Hogere burgers als Bolkestein manipuleren en exploiteren de paniek bij de kleinburgerij. En richten die naar de moslims. Het curieuze is dat er ook progressieven meelopen in dat simpele anti-islamverhaal, en ze het risico niet zien dat zich daarbij aftekent. Wilders mobiliseert de racisten, en Bolkestein en de 'nuttige intellectuelen' helpen hem daar een handje bij. Terwijl men vooral rustig moet blijven, en niet in paniek slaan.

"Ik geef nog een voorbeeld. Ik kan slachtoffer worden van een overval. Moet ik dan conclusies trekken over 'de vreemdelingen', of 'de moslims'? Waar eindigen we dan? Ik dacht altijd dat de kwaliteit van het vrije denken bestond uit het vermogen om incidenten te kunnen overstijgen, te kunnen werken met concepten, te kunnen abstraheren. Het alternatief is dat we alle nuances weigeren. Gaan we voor die diefstal de doodstraf herinvoeren? Dat is dan al kort bij de sharia, niet?"

4 December 2010

The Middle East’s only pretend democracy

MondoWeiss | December 2, 2010


Haaretz notes a recent survey, revealing the hollowness of Israel's claim to be a democracy:

A comprehensive survey compiled by the Israel Democracy Institute and reported in yesterday's Haaretz paints a gloomy, worrisome picture...

...Only 17% of the public believes the state's self-definition as a democracy should take precedence over its self-definition as Jewish; an absolute majority believes that only Jews should be involved in decisions crucial to the state; a majority supports allocating more resources to Jews than Arabs; a third of Jewish citizens support putting Arab citizens in detention camps in wartime; and about two-thirds think Arabs should not become ministers.

...At the root [of the survey's results] lies the twisted belief that democracy means the tyranny of the majority, and that equal rights for all the state's citizens is not an integral part of the democratic system.

...A democracy cannot have two classes of citizens, first-class and second-class.


"The Declaration of the Establishment of the State of Israel" as it appears on the Israel's Ministry of Foreign Affairs' website. An in-page search for the words "democracy" or "democratic" returns the error message "text not found".

Really? Israel can't both be a democracy, and have second-class citizens? Hmm. What a brilliant revelation, if 60 years too late. Despite liberal Zionist delusions to the contrary, Israel has always been a pretend democracy since the founding of the state.

Although I can't find the link, I remember that even the Palestinians inside Israel who weren't expelled in 1948 lived under discriminatory military rule from day one, and have never had equal rights. For example, see the Association of 40 Palestinian villages that Israel refuses to recognize. They don't even get basic garbage service.

28 November 2010

Israël gaat deportatiekamp bouwen voor Afrikaanse illegalen

"Goyim [niet-joden] zijn alleen geboren om ons te dienen. Los daarvan, hebben zij geen plaats in deze wereld; alleen om het volk van Israël te dienen." --Rabbijn Ovadia Yosef, de geestelijk leider van de Shas partij (11 zetels), 11 oktober 2010 2010

Israël gaat een groot deportatiekamp bouwen in de Negev-woestijn voor duizenden Afrikaanse illegalen die het wil uitzetten. Maar niet voor de duizenden Thaise, Chinese en Filippijnse illegalen, die al jarenlang worden uitgebuit door Israëlische boeren. Waarom zou dat zijn? Vanwege de huidskleur? Misschien willen de Afrikanen geen methamfetamine gebruiken om harder en langer te kunnen werken?

De NRC is de enige Nederlandse krant die erover bericht - maar het woord "kamp", en dat het gaat om Afrikanen, wordt in tegenstelling tot de buitenlandse mainstream pers verzwegen. NRC meldt dat "duizenden illegale migranten ... zullen worden gehuisvest in de zuidelijke Negev-woestijn." Gehuisvest?

» Thaise gastarbeiders in Israël systematisch uitgebuit

» Exploited Thais in no man's land
As Israeli rockets whizzed overhead bombarding Gaza, migrant labourers were ordered to work on while their employer took his dogs to safety.

» Netanyahu: Illegal African immigrants - a threat to Israel's Jewish character


A group of children of foreign workers that could be deported from Israel by a decision of the Israeli governament. People took the streets of Tel Aviv to protest against this possibility. August 14 2010

Israel to expel 400 migrant workers’ kids
Monday, August 2, 2010 LOS ANGELES TIMES

JERUSALEM — Israel moved Sunday to deport the offspring of hundreds of migrant workers, mostly small children who were born in Israel, speak Hebrew and have never seen their parents’ native countries.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the new policy was intended to stem a flood of illegal aliens, whose children receive state-funded education and health care benefits, and to defend Israel’s Jewish identity.